
But an age divide is widening, as older Canadians are much more ‘hawkish’ than younger Canadians
These are the results of an online survey conducted between August 24, 2026, and August 25, 2026, sponsored and conducted by INNOVATIVE RESEARCH GROUP. This survey interviewed n=1,345 Canadian citizens, 18 years or older. The results are nationally weighted to n=1,200. Results are weighted by age, gender, region, education, and self-reported federal past vote to ensure that the overall sample’s composition reflects that of the actual population according to Census data.

Hawks have grown across every partisan and age group since January, with the largest increases among NDP identifiers (+18 points) and Canadians aged 55+ (+16 points). They are the strongest supporters of the federal response to Trump: net approval reaches +64 among Hawks and +48 among the Conflicted, compared with only +7 among Doves and −11 among the Ambivalent.
Carney holds a decisive advantage on managing Canada–U.S. relations, leading Poilievre 50% to 27% overall. He is preferred by 71% of Hawks and 58% of the Conflicted, while Doves are almost evenly divided between Carney and Poilievre (42%–40%). Open-ended responses reinforce Carney’s advantage: by late August, 46% of federal-response approvers cited his diplomacy or leadership, up from 35% earlier in the month, while calls for a stronger stance among disapprovers fell from 38% to 14%.
The Elbows Up decision to suspend negotiations receives broad support: net support is +49 overall, rising to +91 among Hawks and +79 among the Conflicted. Even Doves are positive (+21), while Ambivalent Canadians are the only segment with negative net support (−5) and 38% remain unsure.
Support for Poilievre and the CPC’s response produces the reverse pattern: overall opinion is evenly divided, but net approval is highest among Doves (+14) and lowest among Hawks (−17). Supporters cite his ideas (26%) and willingness to stand up to Trump (17%); detractors emphasize distrust (18%), possible appeasement of Trump (14%), and the absence of a clear strategy (14%).
Click here to read the full report!



































